Innovation Challenges

How might we develop a precise, automated and scaleable pest control solution for palm oil plantations, minimising pesticide waste and labour?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

In large-scale oil palm plantations, pest control is critical for maintaining the health and productivity of the trees. One of the most damaging pests in these plantations is the rhinoceros beetle, which attacks the new fronds of palm trees. This leads to significant damage if uncontrolled, since the oil palm trees are a significant investment.

Traditionally, pest control in these environments is labour-intensive, requiring workers to manually inspect and spray pesticide on each tree. This process is inefficient, imprecise, and results in a waste of chemicals, as well as potential harm to beneficial insects needed for pollination.

Currently, workers use long poles to spray pesticides on the tall palm trees where the beetles tend to be. While effective, this method is not precise enough to specifically target the beetles, leading to the indiscriminate spraying of pesticides. The manual nature of the work also requires significant labour, with one worker able to cover only 1 to 1.5 hectares per day, leading to high labour costs and slow pest management. This is a big limitation considering that the industry is currently facing labour shortages.

Attempts to automate the process using off-the-shelf drones have been unsuccessful due to the lack of precision in applying pesticides to the correct parts of the tree. This challenge seeks to overcome these limitations by developing an automated (drone, robot or other) solution that can accurately spray pesticides directly into the top-centre of the trees (at shoots of new fronds). By spraying each tree individually and precisely, we can reduce pesticide usage while still covering the entire block of the plantation.

We are open to different novel solutions; although drones seem promising as they can operate autonomously, are easy to operate by less tech-savvy plantation workers and can achieve the desired precision in spraying. While precision spraying likely requires computer vision and AI technologies, we are not currently looking to use them to detect the beetles, as this is easily done while doing other work at the plantation. If solution providers have detection technologies available, this would be an additional benefit helping to limit the spraying of pesticides to only the neighbourhood of infected trees (instead of the entire block).

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Technical Requirements:

• Easy to operate: Solutions should require little training to utilise, and be easy to operate by workers who are not tech-savvy.
• Weight: The ability to carry a significant amount of pesticide (weight) as each oil palm tree requires 0.2l (approximately 0.2kg) of pesticide, and 1 hectare contains approximately 150 trees
• Precision: The ability to spray in the top centre of the palm tree, at the shoots of new fronds in a 20 to 25 cm radius
• Productivity: the solution should be able to cover a minimum of 10 hectares a day but ideally up to 50 hectares for a post-POC version of the solution

• The performance of the solution will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
• Savings in pesticides will be considered as part of our drive to be more sustainable.
• The solution should consider labour shortages in the industry as an important factor in design. The current labour cost for one person per day is 190,000 Indonesian Rupiahs (approximately S$16), and one person covers 1 to 1.5 hectares a day.

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Solution providers should take note of the current labour costs mentioned above.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q2-Q3 2025.

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: to be determined on a case-by-case basis

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

If the solution is successful, Aastar Trading and KPN Group are willing to support a roll-out across our plantations. The potential market/business opportunity is huge as the plantations owned by KPN Group alone exceed 200,000 hectares. This solution has great potential for scaling up to other plantations or crops too.

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 5 and higher).

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, Aastar Trading is agreeable to the FIP being retained by the solution provider after a period of exclusivity

Learn More

How might we apply AI to optimise energy consumption in large-scale desalination plants?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

ACWA Power, a global leader in desalination, is exploring the use of AI to further reduce the consumption of energy and chemicals in its plants while maintaining the current quantity, quality, and safety levels. The priority of the challenge and the AI model is the reduction of specific energy consumption (the energy needed to produce 1 m3 of potable water).

Desalination is a critical process in addressing global water scarcity, but it is highly energy intensive. The typical desalination plant uses between 3 to 3.5 kWh per cubic meter.

To achieve a reduction, the AI can use operational parameters and measurements as inputs. These parameters include (but are not limited to):

• Temperature, 
• Feed pressure, 
• Recovery ratio,
• Split ratio, 
• Sea water quality parameters (E.g. total dissolved solids (TDS), ion compositions, and plant equipment design data). 

Currently, we use available data and simulation tools, but would like to implement AI to further optimise efficiency gains. The AI model will not be directly connected to the control system, but will provide recommendations to the operators to periodically adjust the parameters. We have previously applied an AI model to reduce its chemical consumption, resulting in substantial savings. We are therefore looking to achieve the same with our specific energy consumption, with possible additional savings in chemical consumption.

As a Saudi-listed company, we are committed to contributing to the Saudi Vision 2030 sustainability targets, and we invite solution providers to help us achieve that goal.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Technical Requirements:

Performance Criteria:

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q2 - Q3 2025.
Phase 2: Full scale trial at one selected project: Q4 2025.
Phase 3: Commercial roll-out: to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY FOR THE PRODUCT/SOLUTION:

How might we empower smallholder farmers in APAC with an affordable digital tool that observes and diagnoses soil and crop health for increased yields, bringing precision agriculture within reach?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

CHN is one of the world’s leading agricultural machinery and equipment manufacturers and operates in over 180 countries worldwide. We are looking to support smallholder farmers in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region with a precision agriculture system, while at the same time expanding our tractor and equipment business.

Smallholder farmers in the APAC region play a crucial role in regional agriculture but often face systemic challenges that limit their productivity. These farmers typically manage small plots of land with limited access to technology, resources, and data that could help optimise their farming practices. Precision agriculture solutions, which are widely used in large-scale industrial farming, have the potential to revolutionise smallholder farming by providing (real-time) insights into soil health, moisture levels, and crop conditions. However, these technologies are often expensive and technically complex, putting them out of reach for smallholder farmers.

In addition to productivity challenges, global demand for sustainability reporting and traceability is increasing. Businesses along the agricultural supply chain must provide data on environmental impacts, such as water usage, carbon emissions, and fertiliser application, driven by regulations like the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Because most of their environmental footprint is associated with the first mile of their supply chains, they are turning to their suppliers for this data. For smallholders, collecting and reporting this data is a significant hurdle, as they lack the necessary tools and connectivity to meet these demands. This excludes them from larger, more lucrative supply chains, thus reducing their earning potential and leaving them vulnerable to market fluctuations.

By developing an affordable, easy-to-use precision agriculture system, this challenge seeks to bridge this technology gap, empowering smallholders to make data-driven decisions that improve yields and resource efficiency.

We are seeking a solution that would ideally (but not necessarily) include:

• Be low-cost and accessible
• Integrate with and/or partly attach to CNH’s equipment (E.g. tractors)
• Leverage the geolocation data that is already available from CNH’s tractors
• Could use sensors if they are easy to use, low maintenance, and can withstand the high temperatures, humidity, and soil and water conditions typical for the APAC region.
• Use geospatial data and other data sources that are available (at reasonable cost levels)
• Be an integrated system as end-users are not technology-savvy (no sub-systems)
• Be adaptable to a wide variety of crops such as rice, wheat, corn, sugar cane, cotton, etc (rice and wheat are a priority)
• Provide (near real-time) data on soil health, moisture levels, and crop needs
• Provide actionable insights into the application of fertiliser, nutrients, pesticides, and water (irrigation)
• Have low infrastructure requirements for connectivity and should be able to handle periods of no connectivity. However, mobile data coverage is generally available in the regions of interest.
• Should be accessible from a smartphone but also for less tech-savvy users (E.g. through SMS).

Given the priority of a low-cost system for accessibility reasons, we understand that trade-offs must be made for the system. We encourage solution providers to apply even if they do not meet all the above and are open to working together on balancing cost and functionality. Next to looking for new technologies that enable low-cost versions of existing precision farming systems, we are looking for novel technologies that can achieve a similar result in a disruptive way. Our main priority with this challenge is to improve farmers’ yields, providing reporting data is secondary.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Technical Requirements:

• Should provide actionable recommendations on water, soil, pesticides, and nutrients
• Maintenance should be limited.
• If batteries are used, they should be long-lasting, and changes should be infrequent and simple
• The system should integrate with and/or partly attach to CNH’s equipment, such as our tractors
• Work in low connectivity environments
• Accessible from a smartphone with SMS as a backup system
• Simple user interface
• Have data export capabilities so data can be included in BI systems

• Cost to the smallholder farmer is an important performance criterion
• We are aiming for a win-win situation for solution providers, smallholder farmers and CNH. We are interested in a solution that adds value to our products, differentiates them from competitors, and helps to increase sales.
• Performance criteria metrics can vary depending on the solution, so we will evaluate the business performance of solutions on a case-by-case basis.

COST TARGET

Since accessibility of the solution for smallholder farmers in APAC is a main concern, the cost level should be as low as possible. Since cost targets will be specific to the solutions offered, we cannot give general guidance. Please note that we are open to exploring different business models together with solution providers (E.g. leasing, financing) to keep the cost of the solution for smallholder farmers as low as possible.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q2-Q3 2025.

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: to be determined on a case-by-case basis

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

If the solution is successful, CNH is willing to support a roll-out across the APAC region. We are the 2nd largest agricultural machinery manufacturer in the world, our distribution network is large and our reach in the region is significant. We are willing to support the go-to-market of solution providers with our distribution resources.

As stated before, we are also willing to explore different business models to make the solution more accessible to farmers.

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 5/6 and higher).

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, FIP ownership is determined on a case-by-case basis where co-developed IP is owned by both parties.

Learn More

How might we produce significantly more clean or renewable energy from an urban industrial setting in a natural resource poor area, other than from traditional solar PV panels?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

As a semiconductor manufacturer, GlobalFoundries is one of the larger users of electricity in Singapore. In line with our net zero goal, our factory roofs that can support the weight of traditional solar panels have already been outfitted. These standard solar panels are fully optimised but only generate a small amount of electricity in comparison to the huge demand needed. We are looking for solutions that can achieve a step-change in our on-site green electricity generation (clean or renewable).

We welcome solutions providers with any type of on-site generation solution that would work at our Singapore location. This might include, but is not limited to:

• Solar
  • Lightweight or flexible solar PV panels for the remaining roof structures that could not structurally support traditional solar panels
  • Structurally sound PV panels that can be placed on the ground on roads and carparks
  • Other types of PV panels integrated in facades or windows, for example
• Wind, lightweight roof mounted or otherwise
• Offshore or nearshore renewable energy solutions if they work close to our Woodlands campus site by the Johor Straits
• Small nuclear modular reactors that can fit into rooms
• Small scale organic solvent waste incineration
• Other clean or renewable energy generation methods that can work on our Woodlands campus site in Singapore

Frequency and time of day for the generated energy is of lesser importance as we can accept switching back to reliance on the grid when the renewable energy might not be available.

Characteristics of our site and buildings include:

• Location in the north of Singapore, 300m from Johor Straits
• The factory buildings are about 8 typical storeys high
• There are metal roofs, concrete roofs, concrete walls and glass windows. The roofs are generally flat surfaces.  
• The remaining roof spaces have lower structural loading limits so they are not suitable for traditional PV panels.
• Small indoor rooms (around 5m x 5m 3m) may be available for equipment/fuel as needed.

We are not looking for:

• Optimisation solutions for our traditional solar PV panels which increase yields by a few percentage points.
• Traditional solar PV panels with greater efficiency of a few percentage points.
• VPPA, RECs, carbon credits, or other non-physical arrangements.
• Cogeneration systems / power plants which require a supplied combustible fuel (carbon-based, ammonia, or hydrogen, etc.). We are looking for on-site generation with sources captured from (close to) our site. We are not interested in a separate supply chain or supply infrastructure for fuels. 

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. 

However, as general guidance USD 12 to 25 cents per kWh when at a stage of mature and scaled up solution is deemed acceptable for the scope of this challenge.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q2-Q3 2025.

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: To be determined on a case-by-case basis

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

If the solution is successful, GlobalFoundries is willing to support a rollout at scale at our Singapore location. Depending on the nature of the solution proposed and its ability to fit to our site, this scale may vary. Given our electricity demand this can be significant (5 semiconductor fabs). If the solution is also suitable to the characteristics of our other global locations we are willing to support a rollout there as well.

Additionally, we are open to solutions providers deploying their solutions with other players and industries. We are willing to actively support sharing the solution with others in the same sector and to cooperate for a case-study or white-paper.

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 5/6 and higher). 

For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, GlobalFoundries is agreeable to the FIP being retained by the solution provider.

Learn More

How might we replace virgin sand and limestone filler with processed concrete demolition waste (CDW) in pre-mixed building materials?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

This challenge aims to resolve several issues in the current building materials industry:

• Vast amounts of concrete demolition waste (CDW) is currently not recycled, resulting in a large environmental footprint.
• Demolition waste contributes to emissions that reflect in the product’s life-cycle analysis.
• Current building materials use a lot of virgin sand and limestone materials as fillers, both of which are non-renewable resources.
• Mining operations for sand and limestone contribute to environmental degradation and additional emissions.
• Pre-mixed building materials rely heavily on sand and limestone fillers.

Saint-Gobain is looking for ways to reduce the climate impact of our operations and make our business practices more circular. Therefore we would like to include CDW in our cement based products as a replacement of sand and limestone filler materials. We are looking for solution providers who can help us with some key challenges to make this a reality. These challenges are:

1. Filtering CDW for foreign materials such as regular- and heavy metals.
2. Crushing the large pieces of CDW into small powder particles.
3. Achieving physical properties to sand and limestone.

This challenge aims to find a sustainable, economic and scalable process to utilise CDW as a filler substitute without compromising product performance, particularly in terms of strength, setting time, and water demand. We are looking to replace up to 20% of our current filler by processed CDW. To further minimize our impact the solution should be conducted in close proximity to our production locations.

In the past we have looked at other industrial waste streams as a filler replacement, but these were not successful. However, if solutions providers believe they can use other waste streams that are available in sufficient quantities, we are open to considering these solutions as well. This might include non-earth based waste materials.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Technical Requirements:

• Waste reduction: Able to divert high volumes of concrete demolition waste into filler materials to achieve a circular economy. The filler should be able to be reused into a cement mixture.
• Sustainability: The process of converting the concrete demolition wastes into fillers requires minimal energy usage and utilizes non-toxic and/or low-impact methods. It should reduce our carbon footprint.
• Non-reaction: The CDW based filler should not cause any reaction with the other materials in our cement based products
• Heavy-metals: The CDW based filler should be free from heavy metals
• Particle size: The particle size of the CDW based filler should be between 0-4mm (preferably by weight: 0-1mm (40%), 1-2mm (30%), 2-4 (30%)), although some particles between 4-8mm is acceptable.
• Performance parity: Ensure that the alternative filler maintains or improves the mechanical and aesthetic properties of existing products, including compressive strength, setting time, and water demand.
• Cost-effective: Economically viable for large-scale implementation. Criteria to be considered includes cost of processing and transportation.

The business performance of solutions will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. However, generally speaking we would be looking for the following benefits:

• Cost-effective: The proposed solution must be cost-effective at scale, although initial lower volumes may allow for higher costs if significant sustainability benefits are demonstrated
• Ability to replace 10-20% of the filler materials by CDW based filler materials.
• Significant contribution to reduction of emissions and improvement in circularity of our products that contain fillers.

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis but must be equivalent or less at full scale production levels. Initial lower volumes allow for higher costs.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q2-Q3 2025

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: to be determined on a case-by-case basis

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

If the solution proves successful in a POC setting in our Johor plant, we are willing to support further deployment in our remaining plants in Malaysia and potentially in the region.

We are looking to process sufficient CDW to achieve a volume of 1,000 to 2,000t/month of filler material.

Additionally, we are open for solution providers to deploy its solution with other industry players.

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startup with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 4 and higher).

We expect solution providers to be able to work in Singapore and Malaysia to conduct the pilots and potential scale-up.

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, Saint-Gobain is agreeable to the FIP being retained by the solution provider.

Learn More

How might we pioneer eco-friendly packaging solutions for bulk construction products, to reduce environmental impact and set new norms for industrial packaging?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

Saint Gobain Singapore & Malaysia is committed to reducing our carbon footprint and is seeking to innovate our packaging to achieve our sustainability goals. Sustainable packaging not only reduces the carbon footprint of the product but also reduces potential waste in the landfill.

Paper packaging is widely used for shipping heavy products (e.g., 25kg to 40kg bags) due to its strength and relative sustainability compared to plastic. However, paper production still results in a significant carbon footprint. This challenge aims to reduce the environmental impact of these paper bags by incorporating at least 30% recycled materials while maintaining durability and functionality.

We are looking to use materials that are sustainable, e.g. bio-based, and have a lower carbon footprint than paper packaging or should consist of post consumer recycled (PCR) material. Since our products are heavy, strength and durability are vital criteria. Our ultimate aim is for our packaging to be fully circular.

Our current packaging consists of 2 to 3 layers of which one layer is a plastic film (PP liner). This challenge is not aimed at finding alternatives for, or replacing the plastic film layer.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Technical Requirements:

• Material composition: The solution must achieve at least 30% recycled content while ensuring that the packaging remains as strong and durable as current two- or three-layer paper packaging. Note that multiple layers are allowed and, if necessary, the current plastic film can be used in the packaging to achieve this requirement.
• Strength: Packaging must retain enough tensile strength for product transportation and handling (25kg and 40kg bags). The packaging must pass strength and durability tests comparable to current packaging, including load-bearing capacity, puncture resistance, and pressure.
• Protection: The material should offer the packaged product protection from moisture, contamination, and leakage.
• Printability: The material should be suitable for standard printing and labeling.
• Environmental footprint: The packaging must demonstrate a lower carbon footprint than current alternatives.

Performance Requirements:

• Cost-effectiveness: The new packaging should have a similar cost level to the current packaging when mass-produced.
• Sustainability: The new packaging should have a minimized environmental footprint (10% reduction) and increase circularity (10% reduction).
• Sources: Sources for the material are preferably local to the Malaysia and Singapore area to prevent transportation-related emissions
  

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. The new packaging should have the ability to achieve cost levels similar to or less than our current packaging.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q2-Q3 2025.

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: to be determined on a case-by-case basis

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

A successful packaging solution will be used for relevant products from our Johor Plant, with the potential to be implemented in our remaining plants in Malaysia. We are targeting 20% of total 40,000 bag/month. Additionally, we are open to solution providers deploying its solution with other industry players.

RESOURCES

• Awarded innovator will receive a cash prize of S$5,000.

• Mentorship and support for solution development.
• Access to relevant datasets, and pilot site(s).

• NOVA by Saint-Gobain is the venture capital and partnerships branch of the company.
• (Upon successful POC completion) Solution providers will be assessed by NOVA for potential venture investment.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 4 and higher). Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, Saint-Gobain is agreeable to the FIP being retained by the solution provider.

Learn More

How might we boost clean energy production at our shipyards by enhancing solar panel performance and exploring novel power generation technologies suitable for harsh environments?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

Seatrium is a leader in sustainable maritime and new energy engineering. We are committed to achieving net zero emissions by 2050, but significant challenges remain in reducing our scope 1 and 2 emissions.

As part of Seatrium’s efforts, we have made significant investments in solar photovoltaic (PV) installations at our shipyards. In Singapore alone, we have an installed base of 18MWp distributed over multiple roofs.

Industrial dust accumulation is a significant challenge limiting the effectiveness of these solar panels. Fine metallic dust and near sea salinity sediments settle on the surfaces of the solar panels, drastically reducing their efficiency and degrading the panels over time.

The cleaning process for these panels is labor-intensive, and needs to be conducted frequently to maintain minimal operational efficiency. Addressing this issue with a solution that can either prevent dust accumulation or enable more efficient, cost-effective cleaning is crucial for increasing solar energy output.

In addition to optimising existing solar infrastructure, we are open to diversifying our renewable energy mix. Given the spatial and environmental constraints of a shipyard—where rooftop space is limited, and dust and weather conditions pose further challenges—there is a need to explore novel renewable energy sources that can supplement solar power. We are open to any novel green electricity generation technique that can generate energy without requiring significant rooftop space or being negatively impacted by the shipyard’s unique conditions.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Technical Requirements:

• Solar Efficiency: The solar cleaning solution must restore or improve the panels’ energy output to within 80-90% of their rated capacity. The proposed method should reduce the need for frequent manual cleaning, targeting a reduction in maintenance costs by at least 30%.
• Energy Output Increase: The proposed renewable energy technologies should contribute at least 300kW additional energy generation at Seatrium’s Singapore shipyards, targeting up to 5 MW of additional capacity from new sources in a post-proof-of-concept phase.
• Integration: Proposed renewable energy solutions should integrate with our existing energy management system and should be integrated in our current yard processes.
• Compliance: all proposed solutions should be compliant with applicable local regulations such as (fire) safety, workers, and buildings, as well as industry standards and guidelines.

Since sustainability is a key driver for this challenge, the solutions will be evaluated by their ability to reduce our scope 1 and 2 emissions. Solutions will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Performance criteria will be generically evaluated by:

• Capability of the fully developed solution in achieving a reduction in our emissions by 50% or more.
• An energy/carbon equivalent assessment before and after deployment.

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. The cost target for a solution post-POC is linked to the price of costs saved from carbon tax (pricing avoided as a result of reduced carbon taxation).

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q2-Q3 2025.

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: to be determined on a case-by-case basis

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

If the solution is successful, we are willing to support a further rollout to our Singapore and global yard locations. Depending on the applicability of the solution, we are also potentially interested in integrating the solution into the vessels and platforms we build.

Additionally, we are open to solution providers to deploy their solutions with other players in the industry.

RESOURCES

• Up to S$50,000 for POC development.
• POC development budget will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis depending on the quality and feasibility of the proposed solutions.

• Mentorship and support for solution development.
• Access to relevant datasets, and pilot site(s).

• Up to S$20,000 grant support from EnterpriseSG on a matching basis.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 5 and higher).

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, FIP ownership will be discussed on case-by-case basis.

Learn More

How might we significantly reduce our scope 1 carbon emissions from the steel fabrication process, through innovative solutions?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM 

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. The cost target for a solution post-POC is linked to the price of costs saved from carbon tax (pricing avoided as a result of reduced carbon taxation).

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 5 and higher).

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, FIP ownership will be discussed on case-by-case basis.

Learn More

How might we find novel solutions to mitigate heat and cool down the Urban Heat Island (UHI) effect on Sentosa’s outdoor environment?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM 

Sentosa is a vibrant island destination host to millions of visitors, local and internation, and home to various tourism destination, such as attractions, hotels/accommodations, integrated resort, F&Bs, golden sandy beaches, lush rainforests, heritage sites, world-renowned golf courses, and deep-water yachting marina. As an island situated near the equator, Sentosa is impacted by      Urban Heat Island (UHI) effects, which result in higher temperatures due to heat absorption and retention by surrounding buildings and infrastructure. 

Given the recent trend of excessive heat, Sentosa is considering implementing novel heat mitigation measures to ensure a good guest experience while enjoying the island. Deploying innovative cooling technologies could enhance Sentosa’s brand value and provide experience benefits, showcasing Sentosa as a sustainable tourism destination. Currently, the highest temperature on Sentosa is about 34-35°C. We would like to decrease this by at least 2 °C.

SDC is therefore inviting solution providers to provide novel, breakthrough solutions to help us cool down various outdoor environments in Sentosa. Examples of outdoor environments include (but are not limited to):

• Beachfronts, 
• Event venues,
• Open space surrounded by buildings,
• Open courtyards,
• Service roads, 
• Pedestrian walkways (which may also serve as a public gathering space), 
• Transient spaces (which visitors use to travel to their next destination).      

Ideally, solutions should be innovative. Solutions could include anything from, but not limited to:

• A canopy- type structure,
• Controlled  airflow,
• New materials such as cooling-tiles etc.

Solutions we are not interested in include:

• (Traditional) fan-based solutions,
• Solutions that drastically affect the aesthetics at the implementation sites (as many Sentosa locations serve as event spaces),
• Solutions with large surface areas.

For the benefit of potential solution providers, here are several pre-selected locations that could serve as implementation sites. There are no preferences for an implementation in a specific location. We would prefer to determine - together with the solution provider - which location fits the proposed solution best.

Locations for consideration (in no order of preference):

S/N	Location	Sample Image
1	Madame Tussaud Forecourt (Area: 2,416 sqm)
2	Central Beach Bazaar (Area: 4,112 sqm)
3	Palawan Beach Event Area (Area: 14,293 sqm)
4	Pedestrian walkways, service roads
5	Fort Siloso (heritage building) (Open space area: 1,350 sqm)
6	Fort Siloso Skywalk (Level 1 open space area: 393 sqm)
7	Palawan Green (Area: 9,004 sqm)

 

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. 

Solution providers may propose the scale and cost for further discussion with SDC.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with breakthrough technologies that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 3 and above, e.g. solution can be an experimental proof of concept).  

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, FIP ownership will be discussed on a case-by-case basis.

Additionally, we believe the following considerations to be important:

• If implemented successfully, this can become a win-win for the demand driver and solution provider with significant scaling opportunities.
• The installation can yield brand value and experience benefits to Sentosa as a sustainable destination.
• There are additional opportunities to enhance guest engagement and for the installation to serve as a form of public education on novel solutions for heat mitigation.
• There might be an opportunity for highly innovative Singapore-based solutions to apply for a government grant and SDC will explore this option together with the solution provider.

How might we reimagine last-mile cold chain logistics with cutting-edge, sustainable solutions that significantly reduce our carbon footprint while ensuring optimal food safety and quality?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM 

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Sigma Alimentos is willing to support a POC through a combination of in-kind and cash investment but does require the startup to co-invest as this is a co-innovation project.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short-time frame (TRL of 5 and higher). For solutions related to ingredients and raw materials, we are willing to look at lower TRL levels (E.g. TRL of 4: Technology validated in a lab environment only). For disruptive technologies, a higher TRL is desired where the solution has been tested in operational environments.

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, FIP ownership will be discussed on a case-by-case basis.

Learn More

How might we reimagine and pioneer sustainable retail packaging, to minimise waste and carbon footprint while maintaining brand allure and visual appeal?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

SFC operates a multi-label store, Design Orchard (DORS), in the heart of Orchard Road in Singapore. We are the official association for the fashion and textile industry in Singapore, with over 200 members and close to 90 brands in DORS which also need packaging requirements.

We have a clear sustainability roadmap for the fashion industry with packaging waste being an important item. Furthermore, sustainability is becoming increasingly vital for retail operations, both to align with consumer demand and upcoming regulations, such as Singapore’s Green Plan 2030.

Packaging, particularly for apparel and lifestyle products, is crucial in brand presence and customer experience. Currently, available eco-friendly packaging options are cost-prohibitive and often lack the required strength and aesthetic appeal. We have already switched from matte-laminated bags to uncoated kraft paper bags to support better recyclability but like to further reduce our footprint.

For use in our own Design Orchard shop and the retail outlets of our members, we are looking for recycled, bio-based, waste-based and/or FSC-certified alternative materials for high-volume packaging items such as (paper) bags, gift bags, wrapping paper, gift tags, and gift boxes. The solution should reduce carbon emissions and waste and preferably implement circular economy practices or be bio-degradable.

We are open to packaging materials made from entirely new materials or hybrid solutions where the new, more sustainable material is mixed with existing materials. The new packaging should perform similarly to existing materials in terms of strength, weight, durability, printing quality and luxury feeling.

In our search for more sustainable packaging, we have already looked at solutions based on sugar cane paper, but the costs were over 300% higher, making it not economically viable.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. For general guidance, we are willing to pay a premium of up to 50% compared to current packaging costs, with the maximum unit price not exceeding S$1 (at scaled-up production volumes).

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

We are looking to use the sustainable packaging solution for our own needs at DORS, but will also market the solution aggressively to business partners and members of the council. As the official association for the fashion and textile industry in Singapore, our members make up a large portion of Singapore’s garment and manufacturing markets, with outlets spanning across the Asian region and in America as well. If the solution is cost-effective, we can pitch it to over 100 brands for their consideration to retail in their stores across Singapore.

Many of our members are SME companies and don’t have access to innovations like sustainable packaging materials. We will be a go-to-market partner towards this interested group of potential customers.

For our own needs, we typically require quantities of 40,000 paper bags per order. In DORS alone, the annual volume required is 65,000 assorted packaging items.

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short-time frame (TRL of 5 and higher).

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, SFC is agreeable to the FIP being retained by the solution provider.

Learn More

How can we find novel solutions and technologies to convert biomass residual waste into base chemicals for Goodyear tyres?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

Our core business is the production of tyres on a global scale. Currently, many of the raw materials used in tyre production are petroleum derived. Many industries - including the tyre industry - must transform their upstream supply base to incorporate new, sustainably sourced raw materials to help reduce carbon emissions and address climate change.

Consider alternatives that align with the following factors:

1. Possible customer demand
2. Carbon footprint reduction
3. Belief that alternatives can be found at cost parity

Examples of base chemicals we believe could potentially be produced include (but are not limited to):

• Naphtha,
• Ethylene,
• Propylene,
• Paraxylene,
• Benzene,
• Ammonia,
• Crude C4,
• Processing oils,
• Styrene,
• Butadiene,
• and/or aniline and other aromatic chemicals.

Of these base chemicals above, naphtha is the most significant potential replacement chemical. However, we are open for any solutions that could replace any base chemical that is petroleum derived.

Today, several recycled and renewable materials and technologies are already readily available in the market. However, most of the available solutions do not deliver the same performance, are subject to food competition, are not commercially viable, and/or do not necessarily reduce carbon footprint. We believe the conversion of biomass residual waste into usable new chemicals for our tyres could be a desirable pathway to help us achieve our sustainability goals while not impacting performance or price.

We are not interested in solutions that:

• Demonstrate a lower performance, as compared to petroleum-based raw materials used today
• Are economically unattractive
• Utilise first cycle biomass
  • We wish to focus on second generation feedstock including crops unsuitable for human or animal consumption or more ideally plant waste materials).
  • Third generation feedstock biomass from algae can also be considered
• Are downcycled (we believe downcycling solutions will not demonstrate sufficient performance)

As an example, Goodyear has already successfully validated and implemented the use of a waste product (rice husk) to produce high-purity silica that meets specifications for use (reinforcing silica in tyre compounds). We are looking for additional technologies that can produce raw materials or base chemicals for the synthesis of tyre materials (E.g., monomers) that are derived from biomass residual waste.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

At scale, we are looking for solutions on par with relevant market prices of petroleum-derived raw materials. We understand that it will take time to reach cost parity as part of achieving economies of scale.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

If the Proof of Concept is successful, Goodyear is willing to support a global rollout pending further commercial discussions.

We also are open for solution providers to propose solutions to non-tyre sectors and believe there are additional opportunities in other industries (E.g. plastics).

For the tyre-industry, we would like the first right of refusal for a limited period of time as part of our potential joint rollout.

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for subject matter experts (SMEs) and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (Technology Readiness Levels - TRL - of 5 and higher, e.g. solution should have been validated in a relevant environment).

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, Goodyear is agreeable to the FIP being retained by the solution provider. In case Goodyear contributes specific (industry) know-how that leads to new FIP creation, in such case, Goodyear would be looking for joint FIP ownership.

Learn More

How might we pioneer a next-generation emulsifier that transforms upcycled materials into high-performance ingredients, enhancing sustainability in food and personal care products?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Technical Requirements:

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. 

We are willing to pay an additional 30% compared to current emulsifier market prices. In absolute numbers, we are targeting a cost level at scaled up production volumes that should be approximately around US$20 per kg.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Selection (To select a solution provider for POC development, we will need to be able to test a sample (1kg to 5kg of volume)): End of February - April. 

Phase 1: POC Development (500kg - 1,000kg of volume): Q3- Q4 2025.

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: to be determined on a case-by-case basis

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

If the solution is proven successful during POC development, we will commercialise the emulsifier with our current and future customer base and expect volumes to reach 100mt per annum. 

Additionally, we are open to solution providers to deploy their solutions with other players.

RESOURCES

• Mentorship and support for solution development.
• Access to relevant datasets and pilot site(s).
  

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 5 and higher). 

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, Maha Chemicals is agreeable to the FIP being retained by the solution provider.

How might we leverage novel technologies in animal nutrition, manure management and precision farming to create a carbon-negative value chain, setting new industry norms in sustainable food production?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM 

Sigma Alimentos continuously aims to improve sustainability throughout our operations and value chain, emphasising solutions for reducing carbon footprint and optimising resource usage.

As part of our ongoing decarbonisation efforts, we are committed to reducing Scope 3 emissions through the Science Based Targets Initiative. We have identified that more than 95% of our total emissions come from Scope 3. For the last year, Sigma has focused on assuring our Scope 3 emissions inventory while aiming to evaluate 80% of their raw material purchases through questionnaires directed to suppliers to learn about their sustainability practices and obtain primary data for our emissions inventory.

When separating the emissions by category, Category 1: Purchases goods and services represents 90% of our total scope 3 emissions, and we are looking to reduce our scope 3 emissions in this area. % of Scope 3 Category 1 CO2 emissions:

• Meat 56%
• Dairy 14%
• Trade Products 13%
• Ingredients 9%
• Packaging 5%

 

We are therefore open for solution providers to suggest solutions for all categories (meat, dairy, trade products etc).

Solutions should consider that it will be easier for us to implement solutions with medium and smaller suppliers. Therefore, the cost has to be palatable to our suppliers too as solutions will have to be adopted by them.

Some examples of innovative solutions that could help reduce scope 3 emissions include:

• Reduce methane emissions through proper manure management.
• Reduce enteric emissions through innovative and safe solutions (E.g. dietary supplements for animals).
• Ensure sustainable animal feed through regenerative agricultural practices.
• Improve feed efficiency and reduce waste (E.g. by adopting precision livestock farming techniques that optimise feeding schedules and quantities, minimising overfeeding and associated methane emissions).

We have previously tried or are currently trying the following approach or solutions :

• Enteric Emissions Control: Cow digestion control
• Manure Management: Transform manure into energy and fertilizers with local farmers, and providing access to technology.
• Conventional Supplier Engagement: Attempts to reduce Scope 3 emissions through standard supplier engagement and monitoring have had limited impact due to a lack of innovative collaboration and insufficient data transparency.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Sigma Alimentos is willing to support a POC through a combination of in-kind and cash investment but does require the startup to co-invest as this is a co-innovation project.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short-time frame (TRL of 5 and higher). For solutions related to ingredients and raw materials, we are willing to look at lower TRL levels (E.g. TRL of 4: Technology validated in a lab environment only). For disruptive technologies, a higher TRL is desired where the solution has been tested in operational environments.

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, FIP ownership will be discussed on a case-by-case basis.

Learn More

How might we capture (and store) CO2 emissions arising from our engine test cell activities?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

ST Engineering, a global technology group, is committed to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across its operations, especially in its commercial aerospace business, where engine testing is a critical and emission-intensive activity.

As the maintenance, repair and overhaul of airplane engines is one of our core business areas, a substantial amount of aviation jet fuel is consumed every year in engine test cell operations generating substantial CO₂ emissions. Currently, these emissions are vented into the atmosphere through exhaust tunnels, contributing directly to the organization’s carbon footprint. We are keen to explore innovative carbon capture (and storage) technologies to, at least partially, bring down the CO2 emissions from our engine testing operations.

For each engine test run, we consumed about (1000-5000) liters of aviation grade fuel (Jet A1), generating around 2.27 tons of CO₂ per 1,000 liters . We are looking for solutions that can demonstrate to capture at least 20% of the resultant emissions.

Potential solutions can include any viable carbon capture technologies including but not limited to:

• Chemical solvents;
• Membrane based technology;
• Reverse Osmosis;
• Oxyfuel combustion;
• Absorption etc.

We are open to any solutions that can achieve our objectives notwithstanding factors such as feasibility of implementation, solution effectiveness and cost.

Solution providers should be aware that there is also a correlation factor to be applied during each engine run depending on the type/model of engines being tested and this correlation factor may potentially be affected for CO2 capture. ST Engineering is willing to work with shortlisted solution providers to jointly resolve this challenge.

To the best of our knowledge, no solution exists in the market today that specifically focuses on CO2 capture from engine test cell activities. In 2023, ST Engineering initiated efforts to explore carbon capture technologies, seeking solutions that could efficiently capture CO₂ without interfering with the operational requirements of our engine test cells. However, current solutions in the market are either unproven in this specific use case or lack the feasibility for real-world implementation in test cells. Any solution must be designed with the test cell environment in mind, ensuring minimal impact on the engine correlation factor used during testing and enabling integration into the existing infrastructure, such as the exhaust tunnel measuring approximately 3.5 meters in diameter and 10-15 meters in length. Furthermore, the solution should be able to withstand the high temperatures and pressures generated by the jet engines.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

Technical Requirements:

• Form factor: Our exhaust tunnel is about 3.6m wide and 10m long. There are 4 functioning engine test cells all with slightly varying sizes.
• Correlation factor impact: The solution should not impact the engine correlation factor to ensure testing accuracy and consistency. There is a specific correlation factor designed for each specific engine model and engine test cell which the solution should not impact. We are willing to work with solution providers to determine the impact on the correlation factor.
• Gas mixture: We require a solution that focuses on CO2 since it forms the bulk of the exhaust emissions. Methane and N2O capture would be a bonus feature but is not a mandatory requirement.
• Efficacy: The solution should capture at least 20% of CO2 emissions when our engine test cells are running.
• Engine temperature: 600 - 1000 °C.
• Engine pressure: 23,000 - 35,000 pounds thrust (depending on engine type).
• Exhaust gas: Vary depending on the amount of jet fuel consumed during the engine test run. As a general estimate, the resultant emission is around 2270 kg for 1000 litres of fuel.
• Mixture of gas (~99.12% CO2, 0.019% CH4, 0.075% N2O).
• Frequency of operations: 6 – 7 engine runs monthly.

ST Engineering is not able to provide specific performance criteria as these will be solution-specific. Depending on the percentage of CO2 captured, performance criteria will vary. Performance criteria will be generically evaluated by:

• Return on Investment (ROI).
• Lifetime of the solution.
• Ease of operations and maintenance with minimal disruption to our engine runs after implementation of proposed solutions.
  

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis. Ideally, the solution or final product should not cost more than S$150,000.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q2-Q4 2025.

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: to be determined on a case-by-case basis.

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

ST Engineering currently operates 4 active engine test cells, excluding our overseas test cell sites.

If the solution is successful, ST Engineering is willing to support further deployment across other ST Engineering sites, e.g. China (Xiamen). We also encourage solution providers to explore further deployment with other industry players and we see a similar demand from other engine OEMs as well as applications in adjacent industries (E.g. automotive).

RESOURCES

• Up to S$150,000 to support the POC development
• POC development budget will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis depending on the quality and feasibility of the proposed solutions.

• Mentorship and support for solution development
• Access to relevant datasets, lab facilities and pilot site(s)

• Up to S$20,000 grant support from EnterpriseSG

Within ST Engineering, the Group encourages individual staff with bright and potential ideas to step forward to propose new products / services offered by the Group and is prepared to fund startups for selected ideas. The Group offers profit sharing for successful startups.

For SOIC 6th Edition, if ST Engineering is involved in one way or another to co-develop any feasible and implementable solutions with participating startups to address the challenges in our challenge statements, we can potentially consider a similar profit sharing plan that we are offering for our own internal successful spin offs. For clarity, we would propose or negotiate such a profit sharing scheme if ST Engineering would materially contribute to the realisation of the solution, e.g. joint Foreground IP creation. Additionally, this profit sharing scheme would be applicable to only startups and not established players.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short-time frame (TRL of 5 and higher).

For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, ST Engineering is agreeable to the FIP being shared with the solution provider depending on each party’s contribution.

Learn More

How might we transform sugarcane bagasse and coconut fibre-enhanced bioplastics that revolutionise single-use packaging using bio-processing?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

Global Mind Agriculture focuses on developing and implementing sustainable agricultural practices that improve resource efficiency and reduce environmental impact. We aim to innovate in regenerative farming, carbon sequestration, and climate-resilient food systems to support a more sustainable global food supply chain.

As part of our ongoing efforts to drive sustainable agriculture, we have identified an opportunity to develop biodegradable plastic solutions from bagasse and coconut. Bagasse is a byproduct of sugarcane processing and due to its fibrous nature, is a promising raw material for producing biodegradable plastics. Similarly, coconut can also be a promising raw material for developing biodegradable plastics.

These plastics can potentially replace traditional single-use plastics, thus contributing significantly to reducing plastic pollution. However, there are challenges and inadequacies in the current technologies and applications in this domain.

Bagasse and coconut are mainly composed of three primary components:

1. Cellulose: This is the primary structural component of plant cell walls and makes up a significant portion of bagasse and coconut. It is a polysaccharide that is composed of glucose units.
2. Hemicellulose: This is the second major component of bagasse, making up about 25-30% of bagasse and coconut. Hemicellulose is a complex carbohydrate made up of different sugar monomers such as xylose, mannose, and galactose. It has a more amorphous structure than cellulose, making it easier to break down.
3. Lignin: The third major component, lignin, is a complex polymer that provides rigidity and resistance to degradation. It acts as a binder for cellulose fibres in the plant cell walls, giving structural strength to the material.

Currently, GMA only uses bagasse for boiler combustion, so we want to expand the application of bagasse.

Current approaches to developing bioplastics from bagasse and coconut suffer from the following challenges:

1. Limited Material Strength and Durability
2. High Production Costs
3. Limited Biodegradability in Certain Environments
4. Lack of Standardisation and Regulation
5. Limited Public Awareness and Acceptance

We previously focused on enhancing the material strength of biodegradable plastics derived from bagasse by blending them with other polymers or reinforcing them with fibres. While blending or reinforcing improves strength to some extent, the resultant materials were often less durable than traditional plastics, and faced issues like reduced flexibility or increased production costs; making them less competitive in the market.

We have also tried to blend bagasse-derived bioplastics with starch, a common biodegradable material. However, this often led to decreased material strength and not enough water resistance.

We are not looking for solutions where we have to utilise multiple chemical processes to produce bioplastics. Solutions and methods should be bio-friendly.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Generally, the maximum product cost for biodegradable plastic solutions from bagasse could be targeted at a range between 5% to 20% higher than the cost of equivalent traditional plastics in the market.

Several factors influence the cost of the final product, including:

• Raw material expenses,
• Production processes,
• Labour,
• Energy consumption, and
• Market demand.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

Phase 1: POC development: Q3-Q4 2025.

Phase 2: Commercial roll-out: To be determined on a case-by-case basis, target implementation by Q1 2026.

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

If the solution is successful, GMA is willing to support a further global rollout. The larger market opportunity is very significant across various industries too. We will be looking to become the go-to-market partner to bring the solution to multiple markets together.

Potential demand from other industries could include (but not limited to):

• Packaging Industry
• Food Service and Catering
• Retail Chains
• Waste Management Companies
• Agricultural Industry
• Custom Manufacturing

RESOURCES

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

We are looking for SMEs and startups with solutions that can be implemented in a relatively short time frame (TRL of 5 and higher).

Intellectual Property (IP): For Background IP (BIP), both parties will retain their respective IPs bought into the project. In the event of new Foreground IP (FIP) creation, FIP ownership will be discussed on a case-by-case basis. GMA also plans to seek a licensing agreement with the selected solution provider to facilitate commercialisation of the solution following a successful POC

How might we improve indoor thermal comfort in Singapore’s public housing flats in a scalable, energy-efficient way?

BACKGROUND OF THE PROBLEM

The Housing & Development Board (HDB) of Singapore is instrumental in providing affordable housing to more than 80% of the resident population. By creating sustainable, comfortable and inclusive living environments, HDB is central to shaping the nation’s housing landscape and enhancing the quality of life for Singaporeans. Singapore’s hot and humid climate makes indoor thermal comfort a key concern, particularly for households without air-conditioning. The rising temperatures driven by climate change have only intensified this challenge, as HDB residents increasingly face days with high humidity days, low wind, relentless heat and conditions that can make homes uncomfortable.

Our developments are designed to embrace local tropical climatic conditions using passive design strategies. These include strategically orientating residential blocks to reduce heat gain from the sun while enhancing natural ventilation within the flats (for which we employ an Environmental Modelling tool IEM). Additionally, HDB has implemented various cooling measures in existing HDB towns such as introducing more greenery in common areas, and piloted the use of cool paint to reduce ambient temperatures (i.e. through the HDB Green Towns Programme). While these approaches help reduce the urban heat island effect within HDB towns and improve thermal comfort for residents, we are looking for more solutions that can be adopted or applied within the flats to further enhance residents’ thermal comfort.

We are open to a wide range of potential solutions focused on improving indoor thermal comfort. Any solution that reduces temperature and humidity or induces wind movement within the flat is attractive. Ideally, solutions can be retrofitted in existing buildings or included in new buildings during construction. Solutions that can be readily applied at scale are preferred. We are open to solutions that can be applied externally (e.g. new building materials, phase-changing materials, etc.), as well as solutions that can be applied internally (e.g. finishes, fixtures and passive or low-energy active cooling solutions, etc.).

With the right solution, this challenge can make a significant impact for residents of 1 million public housing flats in Singapore, and in other hot and humid geographies. Additionally, with a passive or low energy solution, together we can significantly contribute to a more sustainable living environment and are therefore looking forward to your application.

TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS / PERFORMANCE CRITERIA

COST TARGET

Cost targets will be determined on a case-by-case basis.

TIMEFRAME FOR DEVELOPMENT

POTENTIAL MARKET / BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY

Singapore has more than 1 million HDB flats located across 24 towns and 3 estates. These flats accommodate about 80% of Singapore's resident population. The solutions, if successful, can be implemented in flats island-wide. Additionally, we are open for solution providers to collaborate with other companies to pilot their solution.

[SJ1]Suggest to remove this as we are not looking for solutions that residents can choose to purchase directly from the open market based on their needs/ preference

RESOURCES

Learn More

Learn More